Nick Howitt wrote:

Hello Patrick,
Please can you elaborate on these?
1 - Do you mean DHCP such that the DHCP server will not give out IP's to unknown MAC addresses - similar to what you often see in WAP's for WiFi access, or did you mean firewall blocking based on MAC address? Blocking on MAC address is problematic. I think even NetworkManager allows a WiFi interface to randomise its MAC address each time it connects. The reverse would be easier in the firewall, to only allow permitted MAC addresses.
2 - What do you mean by "Account manager is not completely linked with some extensions/users"? Can you give an example? When requesting a tick box is this to replace the current dropdowns? I will file an issue on the dropdowns on App Policies as I think they are no different from groups in the background. - Gitlab https://gitlab.com/clearos/clearfoundation/app-users/issues/8

Hi Nick.

[b]
1 - Do you mean DHCP such that the DHCP server will not give out IP's to unknown MAC addresses - similar to what you often see in WAP's for WiFi access, or did you mean firewall blocking based on MAC address? Blocking on MAC address is problematic. I think even NetworkManager allows a WiFi interface to randomise its MAC address each time it connects. The reverse would be easier in the firewall, to only allow permitted MAC addresses.

Correct. This is exactly what i mean.
One a MAC connect to the DHCP and recieves an IP-adress I want to have the opportunity to block this devices and gets an IP the next time (and connect to the system)

[b]
2 - What do you mean by "Account manager is not completely linked with some extensions/users"? Can you give an example? When requesting a tick box is this to replace the current dropdowns? I will file an issue on the dropdowns on App Policies as I think they are no different from groups in the background. - Gitlab https://gitlab.com/clearos/clearfoundation/app-users/issues/8

Is it possible to tag the option with a certain users for these packages


Something like this, but the a row of tags.

No updates since march 6

Hi,
I noticed the the system didn't receive any update any more since March 6.
For example :
clearsdn-antimalware-6.1-20190305.1025
clearsdn-antispam-6.1-20190305.1025

Which where updated every day.

Is there something changed ?

Dave Loper wrote:

Patrick,

We'll have some announcements about this when it is fully baked but you can try it out. It was designed for iLO 5 which uses Redfish 1.2 so it may not be compatible with the older iLO. But you can try it out and let me know.

Hi Dave,

I've installed the app, but seems not to be working properly

I can set up the account, but then it gives the following errors

Hi Nick

My server is a HP microserver gen8 and has an iLo port.
The question remains, what is this app doing

What is the function of app-iLo in testing repo ?

Hi,

I've seen an developing of a new app for iLo (http://koji.clearos.com/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2582)
What does this app do ?
I think it is for the HP microserver, but i can't find any information.

Regular updates of the apps. Keeping a little bit on track with the updates of bought packages, like Kopano,etc...

definitely a way to block a device on MAC number in DHCP.
Maybe in webconfig more feature to adjust settings. This is very limited now.

Account manager is not completly linked with some extensions/users. A tickbox would be great to enable features

Update Webapp and Z-push

Hi,

For those who are interested you can update Webapp and Z-push with the Kopano repositories.

webapp.repo


z-push.repo


Not sure how this will effect the update coming through COS, but don't think it will have any influence.


I think the main Kopano packages could also be updated, but not yet tried....

kopano.repo
[Kopano-Core]
name=Builds of final releases (RHEL_7)
type=rpm-md
baseurl=https://serial:YOURSERIALNUMBER@download.kopano.io/supported/core:/final/RHEL_7/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://serial:YOURSERIALNUMBER@download.kopano.io/supported/core:/final/RHEL_7/repodata/repomd.xml.key
enabled=1

I'll look into it and post my findings.

You can easily install z-push through the z-push repositories, but the ClearOS dependency can be an issue with update.



I've removed z-push by :


The followed the instruction accoridng the wiki page and add a repo.

Then:


in /usr/share/z-push/config.php, setting the full email option to false:

Ben Chambers wrote:

The z-push project now builds binaries compatible with ClearOS (CentOS);

https://wiki.z-hub.io/display/ZP/Installation

So, there's no need for us to push source through the build system as we've done in the past. We can add binaries to our mirrors quite easily now. If anyone wants to spend some time adding the z-push repo and upgrading and doing some testing, we can certainly make things easier in the future and add binaries to the ClearOS mirrors.

B.

I'll look into it and post my findings.