Profile Details

Toggle Sidebar
Loading cover... Drag cover to reposition
Recent updates
  • Arnaud Forster
    Arnaud Forster replied to a discussion, Route Add

    It worked ! :D
    thanks Nick, you pointed me to the right direction.
    I requested the IP address of the router wich was 10.1.0.1/16

    then I add the following route for my second lan interface (eth2) :

    10.3.0.0/16 via 10.1.0.1


    and ifdown and up eth2..

    My new route is there :
    [root@srv-cos /]# ip r
    default via 81.62.227.45 dev eth0
    10.1.0.0/16 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.49
    10.3.0.0/16 via 10.1.0.1 dev eth2
    192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.2

    And I can ping an adress on the 10.3.0.1 from my eth1 lan :)

    [root@srv-cos /]# ping 10.3.0.1
    PING 10.3.0.1 (10.3.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 10.3.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.556 ms
    64 bytes from 10.3.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
    64 bytes from 10.3.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms

    thanks Nick :)

  • Arnaud Forster
    Arnaud Forster replied to a discussion, Route Add

    ok, so if i'm rigth... in your example, the wan of your second system is connected to your lan of your 1st one.
    So I think my problem is that I dont have the IP address of the second router, just the network definition. I need to ask for it's IP in the range of my second lan interface.
    the routing between my 2 lan interfaces is automatically managed by clearos I think ...
    thanks Nick :)
    I keep you informed

  • Arnaud Forster
    Arnaud Forster replied to a discussion, Route Add

    Ok thanks Nick,
    Maybe my error was to create a second LAN (I had a free network card not used),

    but have nearly the same as you ...

    [root@srv-cos /]# ip r
    default via 81.62.227.45 dev eth0

    10.1.0.0/16 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.49

    10.8.0.0/24 via 10.8.0.2 dev tun0
    10.8.0.2 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.1
    10.8.10.0/24 via 10.8.10.2 dev tun1
    10.8.10.2 dev tun1 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.10.1

    81.62.227.44/30 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 81.62.227.46
    192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.2

    [root@srv-cos /]# ifup eth2
    ".ror: inet address is expected rather than "10.1.0.49

    [root@srv-cos /]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth2
    DEVICE=eth2
    TYPE="Ethernet"
    ONBOOT="yes"
    USERCTL="no"
    BOOTPROTO="static"
    IPADDR="10.1.0.49"
    NETMASK="255.255.0.0"
    [root@srv-cos /]#
    [root@srv-cos /]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth2
    10.3.0.0/16 via 10.1.0.49

  • Arnaud Forster
    Arnaud Forster replied to a discussion, Route Add

    Hello Nick :)
    Yes rather old :)
    that's a little bit complicated because I can't manage the whole network ; another company do that. From my side, I've 2 LAN interfaces on my COS system : eth1 and eth2. My eth2 is connected to a router I'm not managing in the range 10.1.0.49. But they need that somecomputer of my eth1 lan (192.168.1.) can access another network behind their router in the 10.3.0.0/16 range. My COS system is connected to their router using eth2 (10.1.0.49) ; that's why I'm asking if can make a route to join the 10.3.0.0 network via the 10.1.0.49 interface..

    Thanks for your help :)

  • Arnaud Forster
    Arnaud Forster replied to a discussion, Route Add

    Hello all,
    I've a request to add a route to reach a particular network. I've 2 lans : eth1 (192.168.1.0/24) and eth2 (10.1.0.49/16). Now I should be able to reach a network under 10.3.0.0/16 connected somewhere in my eth2 network,
    so I made a new file : route-eth2 and put inside the folllowing line : 10.3.0.0/16 via 10.1.0.49

    But when I do a /sbin/ifup eth2 I get the following error :

    [root@srv-cos ~]# /sbin/ifup eth2
    ".ror: inet address is expected rather than "10.1.0.49

    I dont know if I made a mistake in the content of my file or if this is a problem with the /sbin/ifup command
    thanks for your help

  • Connect Flexshares to Ownclound, best practice

    Hello all,
    I installed Owncloud and it works great ! Thank you
    I'd like now add the flexshares to the managed folders. I've seen that I've to add an external storage to do that but is smb\cifs the best way to do that ?
    And Is possible to connect the /var /flexshare/shares/ folder and then different people will have different acces to the subfolders according to their group ?

    Thanks very much for your help :)

  • Hello Ben,
    Thanks very much for your help :)
    I had a check and unfortunateliy, the folder /etc/clearos/owncloud was empty. But you pointed me into the right direction and I found owncloud_business.conf in /etc/clearos and it worked
    Thanks very much :)

  • Hello all,
    I just installed ownclound and I can grant users to have their own access but impossible to connect with the admin account. In my web interface nothing is provided. Is there a place I can manage it ?
    thanks for your help :)

  • Access my Flexshare files via http from my lan

    Hello all,
    I've a a project for a school where I need to install on old computers a very thin Linux Freerdp client which is done. when this thin client boots up, it has to access a place on my network to get it's configuration file (network config, launch options and where the freerdp has to automatically connect).
    With that solution, when the thin client boots up, it automatically start a freerdp session and automatically connect to a windows terminal server for the students using the credentials included in this configuration file.
    For that, wanted to create a fleshare to store this file. The only problem I've is that the Linux thin client needs the http protocol to get the config file. So, is there a way to configure the web server of Clearos to answer to internal requests and deliver files using http (webdav ?)
    Thanks for your help :)

  • On the domain network is there a way to allow just a group of users to login to a specific machine

    Hello all,
    I've a request from a school which have computers for teachers and some for students. For each group I've a specific account (teacher & student). the school wouldn't like that the 'student' account can log in on teachers' computers. I don't know if there's a way to do that.
    Creating local accounts on the computers is not acceptable for the school (because of maintenance).
    thanks to all for your help
    Arnaud